Cases 11 - 20 of 1,030
Cahill, et al. v. NIKE, Inc.
as 24-2199
Plaintiff:
KELLY CAHILL, HEATHER HENDER, SARA JOHNSTON and others
Intervenor:
INSIDER INC., ADVANCE LOCAL MEDIA, LLC and AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS
Defendant:
NIKE, INC.
United States of America v. Kelly
as 24-1825
Defendant:
HARLAN LEROY KELLY, JR. and Harlan Kelly
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Packwood, et al. v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
as 24-1760
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR PACKWOOD and ANDREA WOOD
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CONTRA COSTA CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, OFFICE OF THE CONTRA COSTA SHERIFF and others
Guerra-Mosquera, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1652
Petitioner:
JOHAN FERNANDO GUERRA-MOSQUERA, KELLY MARITZA PARRA-CORTES, LAURA SOFIA OSSA-PARRA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cardenas Oyola, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1628
Petitioner:
FABIAN CARDENAS OYOLA, KELLY YURANY CADENA CALDERON, ANTONELLA CARDENAS CADENA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Whitaker v. Steward, et al.
as 24-1272
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WHITAKER
Defendant:
HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR, Acting Director, ODOC, STEVE ROBBINS, Chief Financial Officer, ODOC, BOB CULP, Central Trust Manager, ODOC and others
Erskine v. Kelly
as 24-1068
Petitioner:
ROBERT LEE ERSKINE
Respondent:
BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent O.S.P.
Kelly v. Rosales, et al.
as 24-827
Plaintiff:
SHANNON KELLY
Defendant:
M. ROSALES, Correctional Lieutenant, official capacity, J. CODY, Correctional Sergeant, official capacity and J. MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer, official capacity
United States of America v. Deshannon
as 24-703
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KELLY DESHANNON
Fidelman, et al. v. Polis, et al.
as 24-486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK FIDELMAN
Plaintiff:
C.F., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN POLIS, KELLY FIDELMAN, PATRICIA CLEARLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
