Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Henry Hayes v. R. Johnson
as 21-55382
Petitioner / Appellant: HENRY CEPHUS HAYES, AKA Henry M. Mitchell, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee: R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Tom Franks v. R. Johnson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-17497
Defendant / Appellee: STANISLAUS SUPERIOR COURT, Judge #8, R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, Warden, Lancaster State Prison and MICHAEL SCHEID, Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant: TOM MARK FRANKS
Damiean Johnson v. R. Johnson
as 20-56035
Respondent / Appellee: R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: DAMIEAN TREMAINE JOHNSON
Martin Seanz Salcido v. R. Johnson, et al
as 20-55991
Defendant / Appellee: JIAN MA, Doctor, individual and official capacity, CMD STAFF, Unknown Name Doctor, individual and official capacity, R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, Warden, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO
Jorge Perez v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-55971
Plaintiff / Appellant: JORGE ANTONIO PEREZ, AKA Steven Mark Hamm
Defendant / Appellee: R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, individual, M. TAMAYO, individual, GAVIN NEWSOM, individual and others
Raymond Berry v. R. Johnson
as 20-55927
Petitioner / Appellant: RAYMOND GLEN BERRY
Respondent / Appellee: R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Martin Seanz Salcido v. R. Johnson
as 20-16381
Respondent / Appellee: R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO
Charles Jones v. R. Johnson
as 20-15988
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES B. JONES
Respondent / Appellee: R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Michael Tulipat v. Secretary of the Navy, et al
as 20-71431
Respondent: R. C. POWERS, BRADLEY J. GOODE, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS and others
Petitioner: MICHAEL A. TULIPAT
David Millender v. R. Johnson
as 20-55431
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID MILLENDER
Respondent / Appellee: R. C. JOHNSON, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?