Cases 11 - 20 of 182
United States of America v. Gomez-Ruiz
as 23-4173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROSARIO GOMEZ-RUIZ
Trivino Antunez v. Garland
as 23-4025
Petitioner:
ROSARIO FRANCISCA TRIVINO ANTUNEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Romero Ordonez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3637
Petitioner:
ABEL EDIX ROMERO ORDONEZ, ROSARIO CAMPOS TORRES, AXEL A ROMERO CAMPOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abigail Ratchford, et al v. Watford Specialty Insurance Company
as 23-15462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABIGAIL RATCHFORD, as assignees of Dalton Corporation, LUCY PINDER, as assignees of Dalton Corporation, PAIGE HATHAWAY, as assignees of Dalton Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WATFORD SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
USA v. Jesus Favela-Astorga
as 23-10014
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JESUS ROSARIO FAVELA-ASTORGA, AKA Fabela Astorga, AKA Jesus Rosario Fabela Astorga, AKA Jesus Rosario
Century Surety Company v. Popelinos Transportation, Inc., et al
as 23-55051
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTURY SURETY COMPANY
Defendant:
POPELINOS TRANSPORTATION, INC., a corporation, JOSE POPELINO, JOSE BARRAGAN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
D & R WOODS ENTERPRISE, CORP., a corporation
Oliva-Posuelos, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1563
Petitioner:
EVA ROSARIO OLIVA-POSUELOS and DANIEL ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ-OLIVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz Marroquin v. Garland
as 22-1403
Petitioner:
BEATRIZ DEL ROSARIO RUIZ MARROQUIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tomas-Tomas v. Garland
as 22-677
Petitioner:
ROSARIO TOMAS-TOMAS and PABLO ALFREDO PABLO-TOMAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Henriquez Luna v. Garland
as 22-401
Petitioner:
MARIANELA DEL ROSARIO HENRIQUEZ LUNA, EMERSON EDUARDO RIVERA HENRIQUEZ and MAURA ELIZABETH RIVERA HENRIQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
