Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Osama Fahmy v. Jay-Z, et al
as 16-55213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA AHMED FAHMY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY-Z, AKA Shawn Carter, TIMOTHY MOSELY, FKA Timbaland, KYAMBO JOSHUA and others
Osama Fahmy v. Jay-Z, et al
as 16-55213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSAMA AHMED FAHMY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY-Z, AKA Shawn Carter, TIMOTHY MOSELY, FKA Timbaland, KYAMBO JOSHUA and others
Pharrell Williams, et al v. Frankie Gaye, et al
as 15-56880
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
PHARRELL WILLIAMS, an individual, CLIFFORD HARRIS, Jr., an individual and ROBIN THICKE, an individual, DBA I Like'em Thicke Music
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
FRANKIE CHRISTIAN GAYE, an individual, MARVIN GAYE III, an individual and NONA MARVISA GAYE, an individual
Counter-defendant - Appellant:
MORE WATER FROM NAZARETH PUBLISHING, INC., STAR TRAK ENTERTAINMENT, INTERSCOPE RECORDS and others
Amicus Curiae:
MUSICOLOGISTS, 212 SONGWRITERS, COMPOSERS, MUSICIANS, AND PRODUCERS, PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE and others
Will Loomis v. Jessica Cornish, et al
as 13-57093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILL LOOMIS, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSICA CORNISH, FKA Jessie J., an individual, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., Delaware corporation Erroneously Sued As UMG Recordings, Inc. and UNIVERSAL REPUBLIC RECORDS, a division of UMG Recordings, Inc.
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-56744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, STACY FERGUSON, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-55998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, STACY FERGUSON, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Rock River Communications, Inc v. Universal Music Group, Inc., et al
as 12-55180
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROCK RIVER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., UMG RECORDINGS, INC. and UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INTERNATIONAL, LTD
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-55000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant:
STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, UMG RECORDINGS, INC., INTERSCOPE RECORDS and others
Preston Marshall, et al v. Kevin Williams, et al
as 12-15002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRESTON D. MARSHALL, AKA Trent D. Farmer and DEMARIO D. DRIVER, AKA Symba
Intervenor - Appellant:
KEVIN B. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN HUFFMAN, IV, Real Content Media Group, MARIAH CAREY, ISLAND DEF JAM MUSIC GROUP, a Division of UMG Recordings, Inc. and others
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 11-57230
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant:
WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC. and HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
