Cases 11 - 20 of 11,190
McLeod v. Zero Gravity Management, et al.
as 24-3266
Plaintiff:
KURT MCLEOD, an individual
Defendant:
ZERO GRAVITY MANAGEMENT, an unknown business entity, MARK WILLIAMS, an individual and ERIC WILLIAMS, an individual
Taie, et al. v. Ten Bridges LLC, et al.
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
MARY TAIE, an individual, MOYRA COOP, an individual and WILLIAM GROVES, an individual, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of similarly situated persons
Defendant:
TEN BRIDGES LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company and DEMIAN HEALD, an individual; and the marital community comprised of Demian Heald and Doe Heald
Williams v. Luna, et al.
as 24-3187
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SHERIFF LUNA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and others
Spengler v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant:
FREDERICK D. WILLIAMS, Dr.; individual capacity, ZUNIGA, Ms.; individual capacity, HIMAYA, RN; individual capacity and others
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner:
RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Finnegan v. O'Malley
as 24-3131
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. FINNEGAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Edmiston v. Saucedo, et al.
as 24-3145
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Defendant:
RICARDO SAUCEDO, JAMES WEILAND, C.E.R.T. "Senior and WILLIAM GITTERE, added per #7 Screening Order; #8 AC
United States of America v. Williams
as 24-3158
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
Emil v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3080
Petitioner:
RODNEY L. EMIL
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and TIMOTHY FILSON
Hall v. Flaggs, et al.
as 24-3044
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
GWENERVERE FLAGGS, CHERYL NEWMAN GAINS, GWENDOLYN WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
