Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,193
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff: ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant: RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Johnson v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2779
Plaintiff: CHARLEY JOHNSON, Trustee of the Charley E. Johnson Revocable Living Trust
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Armour, et al. v. Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio, et al.
as 24-2726
Plaintiff: OLIVIA ARMOUR and CHANEL E. ARMOUR
Defendant: FIDELITY SELECT TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO, FIDELITY CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES FUND, FIDELITY NEW MILLENIUM FUND and others
Saintillus v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2493
Plaintiff: CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILLIP A. TALBERT, GRANT RABENN and others
Ward v. Pascual, et al.
as 24-2309
Plaintiff: JOSEPH WARD
Defendant: E. PASCUAL, J. SOSA and B. MASSARO
Baptiste v. Mattison
as 24-2290
Petitioner: KENNETH E. BAPTISTE
Respondent: G. MATTISON, Warden
Gibson v. Castellanos, et al.
as 24-2280
Plaintiff: REGINALD GIBSON
Defendant: E. CASTELLANOS, Correctional Officer and C. RILEY, Correctional Officer
Stephens v. Montejo, et al.
as 24-2291
Plaintiff: JIMMIE EARL STEPHENS, also known as Jimmie Stephen
Defendant: E. MONTEJO, Doctor, J. G. STUMPF, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Leiva Griffiths v. Garland
as 24-2209
Petitioner: HUSTEST REY E. LEIVA GRIFFITHS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anderson v. Ravalli County Sheriff, et al.
as 24-2100
Plaintiff: MARK E. ANDERSON
Defendant: RAVALLI COUNTY SHERIFF, TODD BOHLING, POLLY ANDERSON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?