Cases 21 - 30 of 2,301
Turner v. Rogers
as 24-2273
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, DISTRICT JUDGE, US District Court Judge
Auzuma Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-2182
Petitioner:
LUIS RAFAEL AUZUMA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Alfaro v. Garland
as 24-1896
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GONZALEZ-ALFARO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zaragoza, et al. v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA "VICKY" ZARAGOZA, an individual, F.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Gilbert Zaragoza, an individual and L.S.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Nancy Gonzalez an individual
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal entity, Deputy DAVID ANDERSON, #5097 and DOES, 2-10, Inclusive
Gonzalez Mejia v. Garland
as 24-1774
Petitioner:
HUGO ERNESTO GONZALEZ MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-1681
Petitioner:
GABRIEL GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Ayala Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-1576
Petitioner:
KARLA ROCIO AYALA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chen, et al. v. Premier Financial Alliance, Inc., et al.
as 24-1484
Plaintiff:
BIYUN ZONG, DALTON CHEN, YOUXIANG EILEEN WANG and others
Defendant:
PREMIER FINANCIAL ALLIANCE, INC., a suspended California Corporation, or as may be organized under Georgia Law and LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST
Motivar Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1464
Petitioner:
STEFANY MOTIVAR GONZALEZ, YIMMI ALEXANDER ROBALLO PAYARES, EDDIE SANTIAGO ARANGO MOTIVAR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
