Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Kathleen Lowden, et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc.
as 09-35201
Plaintiff - Appellant: KATHLEEN LOWDEN and JOHN MAHOWALD, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: T-MOBILE USA INC., a foreign corporation
Charles Ford, et al v. Verisign, Inc., et al
as 08-56752
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHARLES FORD, DEBRA SZALANSKI, CAROL FOX DE STEFANO and others
Defendant: VERISIGN, INC., JAMSTER!, JAMSTER INTERNATIONAL SARL, DBA Jamster! and others
Defendant - Appellant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., CINGULAR WIRELESS, DBA AT&T Mobility LLC, T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Maria Detwiler v. USDC WWS
as 08-72823
: In re: MARIA DETWILER
Petitioner: MARIA DETWILER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest: T-MOBILE USA INC., a Delaware corporation
Vivendi SA, et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-35561
Plaintiff - Appellant: VIVENDI SA and VIVENDI HOLDING I CORP.
Defendant - Appellee: T-MOBILE USA INC., T-MOBILE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH T-MOBILE INTERNATIONAL AG, DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG and others
T-Mobile USA Inc., et al v. City of Anacorte We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-35493
Plaintiff - Appellee: T-MOBILE USA INC., a Delaware corporation and T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation doing business as T-Mobile
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF ANACORTES, a Washington municipal corporation
Mentha Smith, et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-55535
Plaintiff - Appellant: MENTHA SMITH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JUSTIN GOSSETT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: T-MOBILE USA INC. and POWERTEL INC
North County Comm v. Cellco Partnership, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-55048
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORTH COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
Defendant: CALIFORNIA CATALOG & TECHNOLOGY, d/b/a CTT Telecomms (OCN 573B), TGEC COMMUNICATIONS CO. LLC, CA (OCN 5969), UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORP - CALIFORNIA, (OCN 6261) and others
Defendant - Appellee: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless - CA (OCN 6006), CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless - NM (OCN 6573), T-MOBILE USA, INC., (OCN 6529) and others
Chalk, et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-35909
Plaintiff - Appellant: ELLEN CHALK and PAUL STEWART, husband and wife, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware corporation and SONY ERICCSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS USA, INC., a Delaware corporation
Lowden, et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-35395
Plaintiff - Appellee: KATHLEEN LOWDEN and JOHN MAHOWALD, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: T-MOBILE USA INC., a foreign corporation
Sprint PCS Assets v. City of Palos Verdes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-56106
Plaintiff - Appellee: SPRINT PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, wholly-owned by Sprint Telephony PCS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, a California municipality, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, its governing body, JOSEPH SHERWOOD, in his official capacity as Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Palos Verdes Estates and others
Amicus Curiae: PCIA - THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION, AND THE DAS FORUM, THE CALIFORNIA WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, NEWPATH NETWORKS, LLC AND EXTENET SYSTEMS (CALIFORNIA) LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?