Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Gibson Brands, Inc. v. Viacom International Inc., et al
as 13-57050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GIBSON BRANDS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC., a Delaware corporation and JOHN HORNBY SKEWES & CO. LTD., a United Kingdom corporation
Aviva USA Corporation, et al v. Anil Vazirani, et al
as 13-16869
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
AVIVA USA CORPORATION, an Iowa corporation and AVIVA BRANDS LIMITED, a United Kingdom limited company
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES REGAN, an individual and REGAN & ASSOCIATES LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
ANIL VAZIRANI, an individual, VAZIRANI & ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company and SECURED FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
Aviva USA Corporation, et al v. Anil Vazirani, et al
as 13-16858
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
AVIVA USA CORPORATION, an Iowa corporation and AVIVA BRANDS LIMITED, a United Kingdom limited company
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
ANIL VAZIRANI, an individual, VAZIRANI & ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company and SECURED FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
Fourth Age Limited, et al v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc, et al
as 13-56392
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
FOURTH AGE LIMITED, a United Kingdom corporation, PRISCILLA MARY ANNE REUEL TOLKIEN, as Trustee of the Tolkien Trust, a United Kingdom Charitable Trust, J.R.R. TOLING ESTATE LIMITED, a United Kingdom corporation and others
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
NEW LINE PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation as successor-in-interest to New Line Cinema Corp., WARNER BROS DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION, INC., a division of Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc, a Delaware corporation and others
Gibson Guitar Corp. v. Viacom International Inc., et al
as 13-55912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GIBSON GUITAR CORP., a Delaware corporation pla
Defendant - Appellee:
VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC., a Delaware corporation and JOHN HORNBY SKEWES & CO. LTD., a United Kingdom corporation
Tyrrell Promotions, Ltd. v. Exoto, Inc.
as 13-55906
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TYRRELL PROMOTIONS, LTD., a United Kingdom company
Defendant - Appellant:
EXOTO, INC., a California corporation
John Dugan, et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC
as 13-80123
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JOHN DUGAN, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MATTHEW TAPSCOTT, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and AURORA DUGAN, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Petitioner:
RIKA OLSON and JASON RAY
Defendant - Respondent:
LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC, a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United Kingdom
Wimbledon Financing Master, et al v. David Molner, et al
as 12-56328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WIMBLEDON FINANCING MASTER FUND, LTD, a Cayman Islands company and STILLWATER MARKET NEUTRAL FUND III SPC, a Cayman Islands company
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MOLNER, an individual, SCREEN CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL CORP., Erroneously Sued As Screen Capital International Inc, a Delaware Corporation and ARAMID CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLP, a United Kingdom limited liability partnership
Defendant:
ARAMID ENTERTAINMENT FUND LIMITED
Margaret Morris v. Kenneth Atchity, et al
as 11-56829
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET MORRIS, an individual
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
KENNETH ATCHITY, an individual, ATCHITY ENTERTAINMENT INTERNATIONAL, a business entity form unknown, SONIC AGE LTD., a United Kingdom corporation and others
Wang Hartmann Gibbs & Cauley, v. Jason Witten, et al
as 11-56729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WANG HARTMANN GIBBS & CAULEY, PLC, a Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON BRIAN WITTEN, an individual and WITTEN LAW, LTD., a United Kingdom Private Limited Company, FKA Wang Hartmann Gibbs & Cauley, Ltd.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
