Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,968
Taylor v. County of Washington, et al.
as 24-2998
Plaintiff: JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant: COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Sheriff LOPEZ, ALLISON BROWN and others
Lopez-Cortez v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-2889
Petitioner: RAUL LOPEZ-CORTEZ
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party: S. SALMONSON, WARDEN
Garcia-Avila, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2898
Petitioner: MELVIN ALEXI GARCIA-AVILA, EDITHA DANIELA RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ and ANGELINE DARIANA GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cruz-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2797
Petitioner: YEIMY ROSVENY CRUZ-LOPEZ and VALERY BONILLA-CRUZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez Arostegui, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2787
Petitioner: LESTER PASCUAL LOPEZ AROSTEGUI, ALBA NUBIA RIOS PEREZ and LESLY DARIANA LOPEZ RIOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Chavez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2770
Petitioner: CARLOS SANCHEZ CHAVEZ, BRISEIDA KRISTELLE LOPEZ DE LA TORRE, CARLOS EMMANUEL SANCHEZ LOPEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Domingo Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2769
Petitioner: JUANA DOMINGO RAMOS, ADRIANA ELIZABETH JUAN DOMINGO, FIDEL ESTUARDO JUAN DOMINGO and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ingmire-Lopez v. Whatcom County Jail, et al.
as 24-2695
Plaintiff: DARRELL LEE INGMIRE-LOPEZ
Defendant: WHATCOM COUNTY JAIL and WESTERN STATE HOSPITAL
Lopez-Medina v. Garland
as 24-2670
Petitioner: VANESSA GUADALUPE LOPEZ-MEDINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2609
Petitioner: MARIA GUADALUPE LOPEZ RAMIREZ, IAN EMMANUEL CERRITOS LOPEZ and CHRISTOPHER ALONSO CERRITOS LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?