Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. NEC Corporation, et al
as 12-15181
:
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC., CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NEC CORPORATION, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. and RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al
as 11-16862
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 11-16188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al
as 11-80051
Plaintiff - Respondent:
WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
:
In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
