Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,953
United States of America v. Dade
as 24-3050
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN ERNEST DADE
Medrano Robayo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2993
Petitioner: JOHN HERMES MEDRANO ROBAYO, YUDY CAROLINA HERNANDEZ PARRA, DAN JEREMY MEDRANO HERNANDEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3007
Defendant: J. STEENBERGEN, Medical Personnel at USP Victorville, individual, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL MANK, Former Doctor at USP Victorville and others
Plaintiff: ALBERTO HERNANDEZ
Madsen, et al. v. Jacoby, et al.
as 24-2983
Plaintiff: JOHN MADSEN, STEPHAN LAKE ADVENTURES, LLC and STEPHAN LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant: RUSSELL LEE JACOBY, LAURA MAE JACOBY, KAYLEE LAMAE JACOBY and others
Parks v. McAdorey
as 24-2955
Petitioner: EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent: JOHN MCADOREY, WARDEN
Singh Banga v. Kanios, et al.
as 24-2917
Plaintiff: NAVJEET SINGH BANGA
Defendant: CHRIS GUS KANIOS, DEAN BARBIERI, ELEANOR ARMSTRONG and others
Thomson, et al. v. Hodgson, et al.
as 24-2858
Defendant: CHARLES ROGER POMFRET HODGSON, Roger Hodgson and DELICATE MUSIC, a California general partnership
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS CAMPBELL THOMSON, JOHN ANTHONY HELLIWELL and ROBERT LAYNE SIEBENBERG
Lawson v. University of Hawaii, et al.
as 24-2862
Plaintiff: KENNETH LAWSON
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, DAVID LASSNER, in his official and individual capacities, MICHAEL BRUNO, in his official and individual capacities and others
McDonald v. McAdorey
as 24-2876
Petitioner: ROLAND D. MCDONALD
Respondent: JOHN MCADOREY, WARDEN
Doe, et al. v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft, et al.
as 24-2829
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE and ROBERT ROE
Defendant: DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and LUFTHANSA GROUP BUSINESS SERVICES NEW YORK LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?