Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,279
Dunn v. Rodriguez
as 24-2463
Plaintiff: JOHN DUNN
Defendant: F. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-2473
Petitioner: CELSO ALEXANDER RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2418
Plaintiff: PENNY GARDNER, formerly known as Penny Rodriguez
Defendant: ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON, Acting through and doing business as The Washington Health Care Authority
Franco Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2305
Petitioner: EDER JOSUE FRANCO RODRIGUEZ, ANA YADIRA VALENCIA OCHOA and NICOLE FRANCO VALENCIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Saldana Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-2130
Petitioner: YENNY PAOLA SALDANA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Garcia Rodriguez
as 24-1939
Defendant: JOSE DE JESUS GARCIA RODRIGUEZ and Caballo
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brookins v. Acosta, et al.
as 24-1801
Plaintiff: BARRY L. BROOKINS
Defendant: F. ACOSTA, Correctional Officer at SATF-Corcoran, R. SOTO, Correctional Officer at SATF-Corcoran, A. SHAW, Appeals Coordinator at SATF-Corcoran and others
Pineda Rosa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1682
Petitioner: SARAI ELIZABETH PINEDA ROSA, SONIA ADALI RODRIGUEZ PINEDA, EDWIN ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ RENDEROS and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Rodriguez v. URS Midwest, Inc., et al.
as 24-1518
Respondent: ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, and as an aggrieved employee pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA")
Petitioner: URS MIDWEST, INC., a Delaware corporation and UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?