Cases 31 - 40 of 3,117
Durand v. Muaro, et al.
as 24-1404
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
MUARO, Caseworker and T. COOKE, Assistant Warden
Sivak v. Friedland, et al.
as 24-1350
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, CIRCUIT JUDGE and JENNIFER SUNG, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Childs, et al. v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC, et al.
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
LENA CHILDS, an individual, DONALD CHILDS, an individual, T. CHILDS, a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, Lena Childs and others
Defendant:
SAN DIEGO FAMILY HOUSING, LLC, a California Limited Liability Corporation, LINCOLN MILITARY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership and INDEPTH CORPORATION, a California Corporation
Bats v. Martinez, et al.
as 24-1081
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOBBIE BATS, JR.
Defendant:
L. MARTINEZ, Warden of CTF and T. MAK, Captain (A) of CTF Facility
Peters v. Cohen
as 24-1040
Plaintiff:
JAN PETERS
Defendant:
MALIA M. COHEN, replacing Betty T. Yee, in her official capacity as Chief Fiscal Officer, State Controller of The State of California, and as Trustee of The Unclaimed Property Fund
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. County of Lane
as 24-855
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LANE, Oregon
Horton v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-765
Plaintiff:
ALLEN HORTON, II
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, SANDOVAL, T. HANF and others
Le, et al. v. Prestige Community Credit Union, et al.
as 24-674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TU LE, an individual, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated, GENEVA NGUYEN, an individual, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated and MAI T. LY, an individual, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESTIGE COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, a national credit union and DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
