Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Ahab Nafal v. Rob Bourdon, et al
as 08-55540
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AHAB JOSEPH NAFAL, an individual
Defendant:
SHAWN CARTER, p/k/a JAY-Z, TIMOTHY MOSELY, p/k/a TIMBALAND, TIMBALAND PRODUCTIONS INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BOURDON, BRAD DELSON, MIKE SHINODA and others
Ahab Nafal v. Shawn Carter, et al
as 08-55543
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AHAB JOSEPH NAFAL, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAWN CARTER, p/k/a JAY-Z, TIMOTHY MOSELY, p/k/a TIMBALAND, TIMBALAND PRODUCTIONS INC. and others
Defendant:
EMI BLACKWOOD MUSIC, INC., EMI MUSIC, INC., EMI MUSIC PUBLISHING, INC. and others
Arc Music, Inc. v. Wayne Henderson, Sr., et al
as 10-55644
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
ARC MUSIC, INC., a California corporation, AKA Third Story Music, Inc.
Counter-claimant:
RELAXED MUSIC
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
WAYNE HENDERSON, Sr., an individual
Counter-defendant - Appellee:
INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a division of UMG Recordings, Inc., UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Counter-defendant:
ALBERT JOHNSON, individually and professionally known as PRODIGY, CURTIS JAMES JACKSON, III, individually and professionally known as 50 CENT, MARY JANE BLIGE, an individual and professionally known as MARY J BLIGE and others
UMG Recordings, Inc., et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc.
as 10-55732
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP., a New York corporation, SONGS OF UNIVERSAL, INC., a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
VEOH NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation
Tanya Andersen v. USDCPOR
as 10-70485
:
In re: TANYA ANDERSEN, Individually and as Representative of Others Similarly Situated
Petitioner:
TANYA ANDERSEN, Individually and as Representative of Others Similarly Situated
Respondent:
USDC, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest:
ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, PRIORITY RECORDS, LLC, a California limited liability company, CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
UMG Recordings, Inc., et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc., et al
as 09-56777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaward corporation, UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP., a New York corporation, SONGS OF UNIVERSAL, INC., a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VEOH NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
SHELTER CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, SHELTER VENTURE FUND LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, SPARK CAPITAL LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
UMG Recordings, Inc., et al v. Shelter Capital Partners LLC, et al
as 09-55902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaward corporation, UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP., a New York corporation, SONGS OF UNIVERSAL, INC., a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELTER CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, SHELTER VENTURE FUND LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, SPARK CAPITAL LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant:
VEOH NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation
F.B.T. Productions, LLC, et al v. Aftermath Records, et al
as 09-55817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
F.B.T. PRODUCTIONS, LLC and EM2M, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
AFTERMATH RECORDS, DBA Aftermath Entertainment, INTERSCOPE RECORDS, UMG RECORDING, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
MOTOWN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
UMG Recording Inc, et al v. American Home Assurance Compan
as 08-56905
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UMG RECORDING INC, a Delaware corporation and UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation
George Clinton v. Universal Music Group, Inc., et al
as 08-56765
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE CLINTON, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and UMG RECORDING, INC., a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
