Cases 31 - 36 of 36
William Russell v. DOJ, et al
as 10-55809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MARK RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Arc Music, Inc. v. Wayne Henderson, Sr., et al
as 10-55644
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
ARC MUSIC, INC., a California corporation, AKA Third Story Music, Inc.
Counter-claimant:
RELAXED MUSIC
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
WAYNE HENDERSON, Sr., an individual
Counter-defendant - Appellee:
INTERSCOPE RECORDS, a division of UMG Recordings, Inc., UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Counter-defendant:
ALBERT JOHNSON, individually and professionally known as PRODIGY, CURTIS JAMES JACKSON, III, individually and professionally known as 50 CENT, MARY JANE BLIGE, an individual and professionally known as MARY J BLIGE and others
UMG Recording Inc, et al v. American Home Assurance Compan
as 08-56905
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UMG RECORDING INC, a Delaware corporation and UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation
George Clinton v. Universal Music Group, Inc., et al
as 08-56765
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE CLINTON, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and UMG RECORDING, INC., a Delaware corporation
George Clinton v. Universal Music Group, Inc., et al
as 08-56693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE CLINTON, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation and UMG RECORDING, INC., a Delaware corporation
Nafal v. Carter, et al
as 07-56488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHAB JOSEPH NAFAL
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN CARTER, TIMOTHY MOSELY, ROB BOURDON and others
Defendant:
EMI BLACKWOOD MUSIC, INC., : EMI MUSIC INC; EMI MUSIC PUBLISHING LTD; and EMI MUSIC INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
