Cases 31 - 40 of 835
Caraffa v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-1423
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, named as ADCRR, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Employees of ADCRR and others
McClure v. Citrenbaum, et al.
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
JOHN PATRICK MCCLURE
Defendant:
LEWIS CITRENBAUM, named as Yavapai County Attorney, ERIC JOSEPH CREMONA, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Eric Cremona's Roommate and others
Smith v. Social Security Administration, et al.
as 24-1104
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, UNKNOWN PARTY, Supervisor Andrew and GO2BANK CUSTOMER SERVICE
Johnson v. Nordstrom, Inc., et al.
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
AMANDA JOHNSON
Defendant:
NORDSTROM, INC., Headquarters and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Julie and Will, Nordstrom, Customer Care
Alston v. City of Phoenix, et al.
as 24-793
Plaintiff:
FELICIA MICHELLE ALSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHOENIX, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SONYA SPELLS and others
Caraffa, et al. v. Unknown Tomerlin, et al.
as 24-686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Plaintiff:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Lerner and Rowe Attorneys at Law Offices of Tucson and Phoenix Arizona
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN TOMERLIN, Correctional Officer III, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, named as ADCRR, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Caraffa v. Unknown Leon, et al.
as 24-681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN LEON, c/o mail/property officer at Rincon, UNKNOWN RAMOS, housing unit 5 correctional officer, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as unknown unlawful employees of ASPC- Tucson and others
Turner v. Heisner, et al.
as 24-583
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN GLEN TURNER
Respondent / Appellee:
R. A. HEISNER, BRYAN BIRKHOLZ and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe(s) 1-11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
