Cases 41 - 50 of 2,282
Pineda Rosa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1682
Petitioner:
SARAI ELIZABETH PINEDA ROSA, SONIA ADALI RODRIGUEZ PINEDA, EDWIN ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ RENDEROS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Rodriguez v. URS Midwest, Inc., et al.
as 24-1518
Respondent:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, and as an aggrieved employee pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA")
Petitioner:
URS MIDWEST, INC., a Delaware corporation and UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, JOSE LUIS TELLO-ROBLES, NICOLE ELYSE BROOKS and others
Rodriguez-Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1340
Petitioner:
JUANITA AZUCENA RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ and ALEJANDRA S.A. LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Smith v. Allison, et al.
as 24-1023
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK WAYNE SMITH
Defendant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, CHRISTIAN PFIEFFER, B. CATES and others
Rodriguez v. Corner, et al.
as 24-963
Plaintiff:
LOUIS J. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON D. CORNER and DOES, John, Jane and Doe Partnerships 1-10
Lopez Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-935
Petitioner:
JILDA LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Ramirez
as 24-837
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
OMAR ULISES RODRIGUEZ-RAMIREZ
United States of America v. Rodriguez Ramirez
as 24-814
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
OMAR ULISES RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
