Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Stephen Murray v. FAA, et al
as 16-73479
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MURRAY
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
City of Laguna Beach v. FAA, et al
as 16-73478
Petitioner:
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL P. HUERTA, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
City of Culver City v. USDOT, et al
as 16-73474
Petitioner:
CITY OF CULVER CITY, a chartered municipal corporation
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary of Transportation, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and others
City of Newport Beach v. FAA, et al
as 16-73458
Petitioner:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL P. HUERTA, in his official capacity as Administrator, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
The City of Santa Monica v. FAA
as 16-72827
Petitioner:
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Paul Connors v. NTSB, et al
as 15-70333
Petitioner:
PAUL CONNORS
Respondent:
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
James Lyons, et al v. FAA, et al
as 14-72991
Petitioner:
JAMES E. LYONS, TINA NGUYEN, MARY JANE MCCARTHY and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator
Execjet Charter, Inc. v. Michael Huerta
as 14-71735
Petitioner:
EXECJET CHARTER, INC.
Respondent:
MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration
Michelle Barnes, et al v. FAA
as 14-71180
Petitioner:
MICHELLE BARNES, an individual, PATRICK CONRY, an individual, BLAINE ACKLEY, an individual and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Eitan Leaschauer v. FAA, et al
as 14-71167
Petitioner:
EITAN LEASCHAUER
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator, FAA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
