Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,352
Sivak v. Sung
as 24-655
Petitioner / Appellant: LACEY SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee: SUNG, Judge
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 24-625
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHAN B. BYERLY
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF IDAHO, Idaho Judicial Council, JOSH TEWALT, BRETT PHILLIPS, Access to Courts Coordinator State of Idaho and others
Jansen v. Cobb, et al.
as 24-543
Plaintiff / Appellant: AUSTIN JANSEN
Defendant / Appellee: MONTY COBB, Superior Court Judge and MASON COUNTY
Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-434
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LISA K. SEPE-WESENFELD, Judge and BOBBI TILLMON
Caraffa v. Moyer, et al.
as 24-417
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee: M. MOYER, correctional officer, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Caraffa v. County of Maricopa, et al.
as 24-412
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF MARICOPA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CITY OF TEMPE and others
Soloman v. Pitchford, et al.
as 24-287
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEBIYU SHEFREW SOLOMAN
Defendant / Appellee: JAY PITCHFORD, Public Defender, TANIA PARTIDA, Deputy District Attorney, MARK URIOSTE, Judge and others
Al-Zaghari, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-266
Plaintiff / Appellant: EVA D. AL-ZAGHARI and SHIRLEY V. REMMERT
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUSAN JAKUBOWSKI, Judge, QUENTIN KOPP, Judge and others
Caraffa v. Garwood, et al.
as 24-276
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee: STACEY GARWOOD, STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY and others
Hukill v. State of California, et al.
as 24-268
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON SCOTT HUKILL
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SEAN LAFFERTY, Judge, JAMES NEAVITT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?