Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Oregon Wild, et al v. Kent Connaughton, et al
as 12-35845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OREGON WILD and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MT. ASHLAND ASSOCIATION, DBA Ski Ashland
Soda Mountain Wilderness Counc, et al v. BLM, et al
as 12-35844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SODA MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS COUNCIL, OREGON WILD, KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MURPHY COMPANY
Pacific Rivers Council, et al v. Edward Shepard, et al
as 12-35570
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL, OREGON WILD, KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER and others
Defendant:
EDWARD W. SHEPARD, State Director, Oregon/Washington Bureau of Land Management, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
RON HAILICKA EQUIPMENT, INC., an Oregon corporation and OREGON WEST LUMBER SALES, INC., an Oregon corporation
Sequoia Forestkeeper, et al v. Thomas Tidwell, et al
as 12-16206
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER, CONSERVATION CONGRESS, EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS TIDWELL, in his official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Conservation Northwest, et al v. Mark Rey, et al
as 11-35729
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, GIFFORD PINCHOT TASK FORCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant:
MARK E REY
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
D.R. JOHNSON LUMBER COMPANY
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. USFS, et al
as 11-35626
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CASCADIA WILDLANDS and OREGON WILD
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an administrative agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Intervenor-Defendant:
SECECA SAWMILL CO.
DOW, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 10-35926
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, ROWAN GOULD, Acting U.S. fish and Wildlife Service Director and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF IDAHO, C.L. "BUTCH" OTTER, Governor of Idaho, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
SPORTSMEN FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE
Citizens for Better Forestry, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 10-17293
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITIZENS FOR BETTER FORESTRY, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, GAIL KIMBELL, Chief, U.S. Forest Service, in her official capacity and others
DOW, et al v. Safari Club International, et al
as 10-35897
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, ROWAN GOULD, Acting U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
MONTANA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, IDAHO FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
DOW, et al v. State of Idaho, et al
as 10-35885
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, ROWAN GOULD, Acting U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director, ROWAN GOULD, Acting U.S. fish and Wildlife Service Director and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO and C.L. "BUTCH" OTTER, Governor of Idaho
Intervenor-Defendant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, SPORTSMEN FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE, MONTANA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
