Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,410
Smith v. Matteson
as 24-1798
Petitioner: CRISTIN CONRAD SMITH
Respondent: GISELLE MATTESON
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System v. PlayAGS, Inc., et al.
as 24-1701
Plaintiff: OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Lead Plaintiff
Defendant: PLAYAGS, INC., DAVID LOPEZ, KIMO AKIONA and others
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Parks v. Smith, et al.
as 24-1542
Petitioner: EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent: MATHEW SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, named as Ryan Thronell and others
Beauregard, et al. v. Sampson, et al.
as 24-1324
Plaintiff: MARY JANE BEAUREGARD and JOHN HUGH SMITH
Defendant: CLAYTON SAMPSON, ELISHA SAMPSON, ENVYTV, LLC and others
Smith v. Haight-Biehler, et al.
as 24-1300
Plaintiff: PIERRE SMITH
Defendant: HEIDI HAIGHT-BIEHLER, Medical Doctor, BASS, First Name Unknown, HSA, Health Services Administrator, BULGER, First Name Unknown, MLP, Health Services Professional and others
Smith v. Social Security Administration, et al.
as 24-1104
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, UNKNOWN PARTY, Supervisor Andrew and GO2BANK CUSTOMER SERVICE
Bells v. NDA, et al.
as 24-1085
Plaintiff: CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Defendant: VICTORVILLE USP CORRECTIONS NDA, SHINN, MCCOLLOUGH and others
Smith v. Allison, et al.
as 24-1023
Plaintiff: FREDERICK WAYNE SMITH
Defendant: KATHLEEN ALLISON, CHRISTIAN PFIEFFER, B. CATES and others
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Robinson, et al.
as 24-930
Plaintiff: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant: RUSSELL ALAN ROBINSON, COUNSEL and EQUAAN D. SMITH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?