Cases 41 - 50 of 1,591
Sanchez Guzman v. Garland
as 23-3081
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO SANCHEZ GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Torres-Hurtado v. United States of America
as 23-2284
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE TORRES-HURTADO and Miguel Angel Corraliza Sanchez
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USP Lompoc Warden
Sanchez Rizo v. Garland
as 23-2285
Petitioner:
KYARA NICOLE SANCHEZ RIZO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sharlene Sanchez v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 23-55779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARLENE SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Sanchez Izarra, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2274
Petitioner:
DEISY JUDITH SANCHEZ IZARRA and ANGELICA CABRERA SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Jimenez v. Garland
as 23-2259
Petitioner:
RAUL SANCHEZ JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joshua Harrell v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70167
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JOSHUA HARRELL, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CALIFRONIA STATE UNIVERSITY and others
Petitioner:
JOSHUA HARRELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Sanchez-Garcia v. Garland
as 23-2022
Petitioner:
GERARDO SANCHEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gregory v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-1855
Not Yet Classified:
AZ EYMAN LIBRARIAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DARNELL GREGORY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, CHARLES L RYAN, Director of ADOC, Unknown THOMPSON, named as Mr. Thompson, Complex Warden at Eyman Complex and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
