Cases 41 - 50 of 2,769
Gonshorowski v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1985
Petitioner:
ANALEAH MORIAH GONSHOROWSKI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Mengistu v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2041
Plaintiff:
NEWAY MENGISTU, an individual
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a State of California entity and OTHERS TO BE JOINED UNDER RULE 19 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
People of the State of California v. Express Scripts, Inc., et al.
as 24-1972
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through Los Angeles County Counsel Dawyn R. Harrison
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., EXPRESS SCRIPTS ADMINISTRATORS, LLC, ESI MAIL PHARMACY SERVICE, INC. and others
Marshall v. State of California, et al.
as 24-1938
Plaintiff:
GUS WHO MARSHALL
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, VALLEY WATER, State owned company and others
Wilson v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-1818
Petitioner:
LUKE NOEL WILSON
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Avenal State Prison and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Chukwu v. People of the State of California
as 24-1751
Petitioner:
CHUKWU OBINNA
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation, et al.
as 24-1727
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN S. BECK
Defendant:
CATANZARITE LAW CORPORATION, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, RUBEN DURAN and others
Beck v. State of California, et al.
as 24-1520
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN S. BECK
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUZANNE GRANDT, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Sjodin v. State of California, et al.
as 24-1368
Petitioner:
KIRK ARDELL SJODIN, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and COUNTY OF KERN, Kern County Commissioners District Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
