Cases 71 - 80 of 515
Guillermo Trujillo v. L. Gonzalez, et al
as 21-17064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO, AKA Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Defendant / Appellee:
L. GONZALEZ, C/O at NKSP, J. RAMIREZ, C/O at NKSP, MEJIA, C/O at NKSP and others
Rodas Mejia v. Garland
as 21-1343
Petitioner:
VANESSA JAMIL RODAS MEJIA and ALEJANDRO ENRIQUE RODAS MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Denise Mejia v. Wesley Miller, et al
as 21-56282
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENISE MEJIA, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
WESLEY MILLER, Bureau of Land Management Officer, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Delgadillo-Mejia v. Garland
as 21-1201
Petitioner:
JOSE MARIA DELGADILLO-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivas-Cornejo v. Garland
as 21-1187
Petitioner:
YANIRA BERFALIA RIVAS-CORNEJO and CLAUDIA ELIZABETH MEJIA-RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyes-Mejia v. Garland
as 21-1097
Petitioner:
ADOLFO REYES-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jilanne Barto v. David Miyashiro, et al
as 21-56223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILANNE D. BARTO
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MIYASHIRO, In his official capacity as Superintendent Cajon Valley Union School District, JAMES MILLER, each in their official capacity as Trustee of Cajon Valley Union School District Board of Trustees, JO ALEGRIA and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Lopez Mejia v. Garland
as 21-1042
Petitioner:
SULY DE JESUS LOPEZ MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jose Mejia-Leyva v. USA
as 21-71330
Petitioner:
JOSE MEJIA-LEYVA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Byron McKnight, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 21-16623
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BYRON MCKNIGHT, JULIAN MENA, TODD SCHREIBER and others
Appellant:
JENNIFER HINOJOSA
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation and RASIER, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
