Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 685
United States of America v. Aslanian
as 24-3172
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARTHUR RAFFY ASLANIAN
Taylor v. Gordan, et al.
as 24-3049
Plaintiff: ARTHUR TAYLOR
Defendant: GORDAN, C/O- Retaliation, D. ECUENA, Warden (A), KANCTLL, Lieutenant and others
Torlucci v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 24-2605
Petitioner: ARTHUR TORLUCCI
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Interested Party: STATE OF CALIFORNIA and TRENT ALLEN
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff: GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant: RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Ciria, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1847
Plaintiff: PEDRO CIRIA and YOJANA PAIZ
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ARTHUR GERRANS, JAMES CROWLEY and others
Salinas v. Garland
as 24-1749
Petitioner: JUSTIS ARTHUR SALINAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez v. County of Graham, et al.
as 24-1675
Plaintiff: DEBORAH SANCHEZ, an adult individual
Defendant: COUNTY OF GRAHAM, a government entity, PJ ALLRED, Graham County Sheriff, a government officer/jural entity, ARTHUR PEREZ, JR., husband and others
Kusalich v. Perez, et al.
as 24-290
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS KUSALICH
Defendant / Appellee: PEREZ, Warden, ARTHUR DUDLEY, Attorney at Law, SOUZA, C/O and others
Jackson, et al. v. Allison, et al.
as 23-4271
Plaintiff / Appellee: ARTHUR DUANE JACKSON, LAMAVIS A. COMUNDOIWILLA and ROY L. BROWN
Defendant / Appellant: KATHLEEN ALLISON, RON BROOMFIELD, RALPH DIAZ and others
Silva Franco, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4014
Petitioner: JHONATAS AMORIM SILVA FRANCO, GISLAINE FRANCO VALADARES AMORIM, BENHOUR FRANCO VALADARES AMORIM and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?