Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,777
Mahon v. Apple Inc., et al.
as 24-3571
Plaintiff: MARK MAHON
Defendant: APPLE INC., ITUNES STORE and APPLE DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Mahon v. YouTube, LLC, et al.
as 24-3570
Plaintiff: MARK MAHON
Defendant: YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE LLC
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
Fregia v. Miranda, et al.
as 24-3501
Plaintiff: MARK FREGIA
Defendant: P.A. MIRANDA, SAVAGE and RIDGE
Koch v. City of Spokane, et al.
as 24-3485
Plaintiff: MARK A. KOCH
Defendant: CITY OF SPOKANE, a Municipality and SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, a Municipality
Taylor v. Brown
as 24-3441
Plaintiff: JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR, Genius, Melo and others
Defendant: MARK D. BROWN
Oravetz v. Unknown Party
as 24-3408
Plaintiff: MARK ORAVETZ
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTY
Patacsil, et al. v. Google LLC, et al.
as 24-3387
Plaintiff: NAPOLEON PATACSIL, individually, and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, GEORGE JACK, MARK CARSON and others
Appellant: JOHN ANDREN, MATTHEW LILLEY and JOSEPH S. ST. JOHN
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC, XXVI HOLDINGS INC and ALPHABET INC.
Hazari v. Santa Clara County Superior Court, et al.
as 24-3353
Plaintiff: CYRUS HAZARI
Defendant: SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, APPEAL COURT OF THE SIXTH DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT and others
McLeod v. Zero Gravity Management, et al.
as 24-3266
Plaintiff: KURT MCLEOD, an individual
Defendant: ZERO GRAVITY MANAGEMENT, an unknown business entity, MARK WILLIAMS, an individual and ERIC WILLIAMS, an individual

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?