Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Spengler v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3219
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant: FREDERICK D. WILLIAMS, Dr.; individual capacity, ZUNIGA, Ms.; individual capacity, HIMAYA, RN; individual capacity and others
Veliz-Sarabia v. Garland
as 23-630
Petitioner: GABRIEL VELIZ-SARABIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Zuky Sarabia
as 22-10201
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ZUKY SARABIA
Sanchez-Sarabia v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-581
Petitioner: ELIODORO SANCHEZ-SARABIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mario Santiago-Sarabia v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70597
Petitioner: MARIO SANTIAGO-SARABIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Jorge Barriga Guzman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50022
Defendant / Appellant: JORGE BARRIGA GUZMAN, AKA Jorge Barriga, AKA Jorge Gomez Barriga, AKA Jorge Guzman, AKA Jorge Guzman Barriga, AKA Rodrigo Lopez Sarabia, AKA Ramon Sarabia Lopez
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marilu Touma v. EEOC, et al
as 20-56126
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, 1 through 10, Inclusive, EEOC EMPLOYEE, 1, 2, 3, PARADOM, Unknown officer name and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARILU F. TOUMA
John Bivins v. Marco Rodriguez, et al
as 20-15983
Defendant / Appellee: CHRIS SARABIA, California Highway Patrol Officer, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MARCO RODRIGUEZ, Deputy U.S. Marshal
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN PENN BIVINS
Melvin Pena-Sarabia v. William Barr
as 19-72456
Petitioner: MELVIN DANILO PENA-SARABIA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Karina Facundo Sarabia, et al v. William Barr
as 19-71908
Petitioner: KARINA FACUNDO SARABIA, AXEL YOSAFAT PALACIOS FACUNDO and AGUSTIN FACUNDO SARABIA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?