Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Joy Nwabueze, et al v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, et al
as 13-17656
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOY NWABUEZE, individually & on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Objector - Appellant: GORDON B. MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, doing business as AT&T California, a California corporation, AT&T SERVICES INCORPORATED and AT&T OPERATIONS, INC.
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-16188
Plaintiff - Appellant: AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
James Harrington, et al v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 09-16702
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES C. HARRINGTON, RICHARD A. GRIGG, LOUIS BLACK and others
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T, INC., AT&T CORP., AT&T OPERATIONS INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?