Cases 1 - 10 of 662
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Whalen, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-2086
Petitioner:
CHRISTINE WHALEN, KATHERINE ARCELL, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and THE KROGER CO.
Hearns v. Trahune, et al.
as 24-1796
Petitioner:
CLARENCE L. HEARNS
Respondent:
CAL TRAHUNE and BILL LOCKYER
Hearns v. Trahune, et al.
as 24-903
Petitioner:
CLARENCE L. HEARNS
Respondent:
CAL TRAHUNE and BILL LOCKYEAR
Van Huisen v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-842
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PR, CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, K. BIEKER, CEO, CCC and others
Corbray v. Robnett, et al.
as 24-608
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS D CORBRAY and Dennis Derise Corbray
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY ROBNETT, Pierce County Prosecutor and BILL ROBNETT
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu, et al.
as 24-457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGARAJAN DURAISAMY
Defendant / Appellee:
PRADEEP PULI RUKMANGATHA SAIRAM BABU, KOUSALYA NAGARAJAN, HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and others
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
McLaughlin v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 23-3724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN DAVID MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - DISTRICT OF OREGON and others
Nair, et al. v. Toth, et al.
as 23-3682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAYAKUMAR SUNDARAN NAIR, RAJAKUMARI SUSHEELKUMAR, JAYAKRISHNAN K NAIR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX TOTH, PAUL LEE, DJ VYZIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
