Cases 1 - 10 of 501
Koklich, et al. v. Borders, et al.
as 24-3505
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KOKLICH, individually and as Class Representatives, HAROLD W. TAYLOR, DAVID M. ZIEMKE and others
Defendant:
DEAN BORDERS, Warden and Senior Administrative and Policy making Officer, individual and official capacity and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, a California Public Entity
Moe v. GEICO Indemnity Company, et al.
as 24-3271
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. MOE, individually and on behalf of all individuals of the class similarly situated
Defendant:
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Armour, et al. v. Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio, et al.
as 24-2726
Plaintiff:
OLIVIA ARMOUR and CHANEL E. ARMOUR
Defendant:
FIDELITY SELECT TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO, FIDELITY CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES FUND, FIDELITY NEW MILLENIUM FUND and others
Mirabadi v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al.
as 24-1487
Plaintiff:
FARAH MIRABADI, individual and on behalf of a class of other similarly situated individual
Defendant:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., a Utah Corporation and DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Ruiz v. Polar, et al.
as 24-1215
Plaintiff:
RENE A. RUIZ, individually, and as a proposed class representative
Defendant:
RYAN POLAR, Deputy, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF VICTORVILLE and others
Sabana v. Does
as 24-987
Plaintiff:
DANNY SABANA, individually and as a representative of a Putative Class of Participants and Beneficiaries, on behalf of all similarly situated participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Corelogic, Inc. 401(K) Savings Plan
Defendant:
CORELOGIC, INC., THE RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE OF CORELOGIC, INC. 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN and DOES, 1 through 10
Flaxman, et al. v. Ferguson, et al.
as 24-919
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM FLAXMAN, individually and for a proposed class and AMY HAGOPIAN, individually and for a proposed class
Defendant:
BOB FERGUSON, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Washington and KATE REYNOLDS, Kate Reynolds in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Executive Ethics Board of the State of Washington
Wehner v. Genentech, Inc., et al.
as 24-697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW WEHNER, Individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the U.S. Roche 401(K) Savings Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
GENENTECH, INC. and UNITED STATES ROCHE DC FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE
Le, et al. v. Prestige Community Credit Union, et al.
as 24-674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TU LE, an individual, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated, GENEVA NGUYEN, an individual, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated and MAI T. LY, an individual, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESTIGE COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, a national credit union and DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive
Matthews, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-3874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRY MATTHEWS, DOMINIC ROSS HUNN and JAMAR HEARNS, individually and as class representatives
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT and LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
