Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Softketeers, Inc. v. Regal West Corporation, et al.
as 24-451
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOFTKETEERS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
REGAL WEST CORPORATION, VU HO INC., THAI TRAN INC. and others
Softketeers, Inc. v. Regal West Corporation, et al.
as 24-150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SOFTKETEERS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
REGAL WEST CORPORATION, a Washington corporation doing business as Regal Logistics Inc, VU HO INC., THAI TRAN INC. and others
Lee v. Lee, et al.
as 23-3758
Defendant:
DONG YEOUN LEE, Damon Lee and GRACE MIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JIAE LEE
Defendant / Appellant:
CREATIVE GLOBAL INVESTMENT, INC., a California corporation
Lee v. Lee, et al.
as 23-3734
Defendant / Appellant:
DONG YEOUN LEE and Damon Lee
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JIAE LEE
Defendant:
CREATIVE GLOBAL INVESTMENT, INC., a California corporation and GRACE MIN
Jiajie Zhu v. Jing Li, et al
as 23-16173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JIAJIE ZHU
Defendant / Appellant:
JING LI and DONG CHEN
Softketeers, Inc. v. Regal West Corporation, et al
as 23-55136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SOFTKETEERS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
REGAL WEST CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, DBA Regal Logistics, VU HO INC., THAI TRAN INC. and others
Armin Azod, et al v. James Robinson, et al
as 22-56186
Petitioner:
ARMIN AZOD, an individual, RAMEZ ELGAMMAL, Dr., an individual, SHANTANU SHARMA, Dr., an individual and others
Respondent:
JAMES G. ROBINSON, an individual, MORGAN CREEK PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, GOOD STUFF, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
