Cases 1 - 10 of 356
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Martin v. County of Pierce, et al.
as 24-1934
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY S. MARTIN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PIERCE, a Washington political subdivision, COUNTY OF PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Doe Correction Officers 1-10, NAPHCARE, INC., an Alabama corporation doing business in the State of Washington and others
United States of America v. Russell
as 24-1812
Defendant:
HUGH ALLEN RUSSELL, II and Hugh Allen Russell
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hughes v. Marquez, et al.
as 24-1803
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL TRELAWNEY HUGHES
Defendant:
MARQUEZ, Correctional Officer of Federal Prison, Lietuenant T. DENNIS, FLORES, Correctional Officer of Federal Prison and others
United States of America v. Hughes
as 24-1792
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SAMUEL TRELAWNEY HUGHES
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Beauregard, et al. v. Sampson, et al.
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
MARY JANE BEAUREGARD and JOHN HUGH SMITH
Defendant:
CLAYTON SAMPSON, ELISHA SAMPSON, ENVYTV, LLC and others
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Spina v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO FRANCOIS SPINA, II, also named as Antonio Spina and Antonio Francois Spina
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, WALTER HENSLEY, UNKNOWN STICKLEY and others
Hughes v. United States of America
as 23-3907
Petitioner:
SAMUEL TRELAWNEY HUGHES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
