Cases 1 - 10 of 242
Misuraca v. Ireland, et al.
as 24-2843
Plaintiff:
AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Defendant:
STEPHEN IRELAND, all individual and in their official capacities, Nurse Practitioner FRANKS, (NP Franks) (Nurse at SRCI); all individual and in their official capacities, ASHLEY CLEMMENTS, (Nurse at SRCI); all individual and in their official capacities and others
Al-Almin v. Miller
as 24-2792
Petitioner:
HAFEEZ IBNSALEEM AL-ALMIN
Respondent:
JAMIE MILLER, Superintendent, SRCI
Welch v. Hicks, et al.
as 24-2633
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
J HICKS, IHAN AZZAM, HANF and others
Misuraca v. Loke, et al.
as 24-2219
Defendant:
AMY BRAEUNINGER, DON at W.C.J, JAMIE LOKE, Corrections Officer at Washington County jail (W.C.J.), HARMONY JONES, Corrections Officer at W.C.J. and others
Plaintiff:
AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Gibson, et al. v. City of Portland, et al.
as 24-1663
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GIBSON and RUSSELL SCHULTZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH, MULTNOMAH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Ochoa Contreras, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1407
Petitioner:
JAMES PAUL OCHOA CONTRERAS, VICTORIA FLORES PALACIOS and JAMIE JAMES OCHOA FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Matsuba
as 24-1073
Defendant:
JAMIE MATSUBA, Jamie Michaels and Jamie Yukari
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-438
Petitioner:
KENT KNOX JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Not Classified By Court:
EL DORADO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DAVID L. DEVORE, MICHAEL J. MCLAUGHLIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
