Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,928
Cheairs v. City of Seattle, et al.
as 24-3163
Plaintiff: TAYLOR CHEAIRS
Defendant: CITY OF SEATTLE, and its officers, employees and agents, CITY OF SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, and its officers, employees and agents and JOHN DOES, 1-10, unidentified members of the Seattle Police Department
Sharif v. Swindling, et al.
as 24-3153
Plaintiff: MUHSIN SHARIF
Defendant: ALEX SWINDLING, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-3, Police Officers with the Eugene Police Department, ALEC SWINDLING and others
Moli v. King County - State of Washington, et al.
as 24-3155
Plaintiff: FUAMATALA MOLI
Defendant: KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-10
Gardner v. Brown, et al.
as 24-3127
Defendant: COLETTE S. PETERS, Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, KATE BROWN, Governor of Oregon, C. Peters and others
Plaintiff: TYLER GARDNER
Ranger v. McAdorey
as 24-3094
Petitioner: CLAUDE RANGER, III
Respondent: JOHN MCADOREY, WARDEN
United States of America v. Dade
as 24-3050
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN ERNEST DADE
Hernandez v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3007
Defendant: J. STEENBERGEN, Medical Personnel at USP Victorville, individual, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL MANK, Former Doctor at USP Victorville and others
Plaintiff: ALBERTO HERNANDEZ
Medrano Robayo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2993
Petitioner: JOHN HERMES MEDRANO ROBAYO, YUDY CAROLINA HERNANDEZ PARRA, DAN JEREMY MEDRANO HERNANDEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Madsen, et al. v. Jacoby, et al.
as 24-2983
Plaintiff: JOHN MADSEN, STEPHAN LAKE ADVENTURES, LLC and STEPHAN LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant: RUSSELL LEE JACOBY, LAURA MAE JACOBY, KAYLEE LAMAE JACOBY and others
Parks v. McAdorey
as 24-2955
Petitioner: EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent: JOHN MCADOREY, WARDEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?