Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,331
Tate v. Montgomery
as 24-3802
Petitioner: LIONEL TATE, SR.
Respondent: WARREN L. MONTGOMERY
Metricolor LLC v. L Oreal USA, Inc, et al.
as 24-3747
Plaintiff: METRICOLOR LLC
Defendant: L OREAL USA, INC, L OREAL USA PRODUCTS, INC., L OREAL USA S D INC and others
United States of America v. Garcia
as 24-3708
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOSEPH L. GARCIA
Hall v. Rosenberg, et al.
as 24-3580
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: Magistrate Judge ALICIA G. ROSENBERG, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE, Attorney CAREE HARPER, ATTORNEY, Civil Rights Attorney and others
McNeely v. Loeschner, et al.
as 24-3601
Plaintiff: DAVID MCNEELY
Defendant: PETER LOESCHNER, CHRIS CRAWFORTH, KEVIN L. DACH and others
Puki v. County of Okanogan, et al.
as 24-3556
Plaintiff: MICHELLE L. PUKI, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lori Langton
Defendant: COUNTY OF OKANOGAN, OKANOGAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, a Washington non-profit corporation, DAVID KOPP and others
LaKamp, et al. v. Runft, et al.
as 24-3543
Plaintiff: CHARLES M. LAKAMP, doing business as Metrom Associated Service, a California sole proprietorship and MARIANNE LAKAMP, husband and wife, individually and as Trustees of the LaKamp Family Trust UTD February 23, 1999
Defendant: JOHN L. RUNFT, an individual, JOHN CRIGLER, an individual, THE ESTATE OF JOHN MALLETTA and others
Chastain, et al. v. Howard, et al.
as 24-3520
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. CHASTAIN and CHASTAIN RESEARCH GROUP, INC.
Defendant: SUSAN L. HOWARD, formerly known as Susan L. Chastain and HARRIET MAJOR
Marin v. Catano, et al.
as 24-3516
Plaintiff: MEL M. MARIN
Defendant: KRISTINE CATANO, ADELA DE LA TORRE, VANESSA RUIZ and others
Shotwell v. Chavez-Epperson, et al.
as 24-3459
Plaintiff: MANUEL EUGENE SHOTWELL
Defendant: CHAVEZ-EPPERSON, DELANEY, E. MEDINA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?