Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Madrigal Vivanco v. Garland
as 24-4932
Petitioner:
MARLEN CONSUELO MADRIGAL VIVANCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Valencia Madrigal v. Garland
as 24-4275
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
MARICELA VALENCIA MADRIGAL
Madrigal Flores v. Garland
as 24-3682
Petitioner:
RAMON MADRIGAL FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-3563
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, C. BIRCH and others
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-3562
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, C. BIRCH and others
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2755
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, ROBERT BONTA and others
Other:
COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK, LAMBERT BASSLER, JUDITH COBURN and others
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2751
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor, ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General and others
Mora Alvarez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2698
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MORA ALVAREZ, MARIA MADRIGAL GARIBO, MARIA MORA MADRIGAL and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-1856
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, Judge, Martinez Court - Contra Costa County, C. BIRCH and others
United States of America v. Chavez
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANGELA MADRIGAL CHAVEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
