Cases 1 - 10 of 1,903
Woolley v. O'Malley
as 24-3745
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM WOOLLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Morrow v. O'Malley
as 24-3711
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MORROW
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Hall v. Estrada, et al.
as 24-3683
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
US Attorney MARTIN ESTRADA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Martin-Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3669
Petitioner:
DULCE VERONICA MARTIN-PEREZ and ZOE YAMILET MARTIN-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Houlihan v. O'Malley
as 24-3593
Plaintiff:
BEATRIZ HOULIHAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Walker v. O'Malley
as 24-3598
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DAVID WALKER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Galvez v. O'Malley
as 24-3569
Plaintiff:
LYDIA GALVEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
Nadon v. O'Malley
as 24-3506
Plaintiff:
DIONNE MARIE NADON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Anbang Group Holdings Co. Limited, et al. v. Zhou, et al.
as 24-3419
Not Yet Classified:
AB STABLE IX LLC, AB STABLE VIII LLC, ANBANG GROUP HOLDINGS CO. LIMITED and others
Defendant:
HAIBIN ZHOU, also known as Hai Bin Zhou also known as Andrew Zhou also known as Andy Bang also known as Joe Martin, WORLD AWARD FOUNDATION INC., YAN ZHAO, ATTORNEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
