Cases 1 - 10 of 495
Williams v. Luna, et al.
as 24-3187
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SHERIFF LUNA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and others
Pallares-Medina, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3184
Petitioner:
GRISEL PALLARES-MEDINA, LUZ ALEJANDRA GUZMAN-PALLARES and GRETTEL GISELLE GUZMAN-PALLARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez-Medina v. Garland
as 24-2670
Petitioner:
VANESSA GUADALUPE LOPEZ-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cucunubo Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2428
Petitioner:
JOSE RICARDO CUCUNUBO PEREZ, YULI ANDREA MEDINA GONZALEZ, CHRISTIAN RICHARD CUCUNUBO MEDINA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medina v. Garland
as 24-2246
Petitioner:
JESUS MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nguyen, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2036
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NGUYEN, DOMINIC BOGUSKI, JAY MEDINA and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her capacity as the Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Medina-Ventura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1651
Petitioner:
DORA ISABEL MEDINA-VENTURA and MIA KIMBERLY ESTRADA-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Khan v. Stricklin, et al.
as 24-1446
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD KHAN
Defendant:
ROBIN STRICKLIN, SEAN TUMACDER, LORENA GOMEZ and others
Mercado Medina, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1137
Petitioner:
ROGELIO MERCADO MEDINA, ELIA MATA MANCILLA, EMILY MERCADO MATA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
