Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 862
Clinton v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-3706
Plaintiff: MARKEITH CLINTON
Defendant: M. POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden, S. STEADMAN, Associate Warden and others
Bullivant v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al.
as 24-3693
Petitioner: MELANIE BULLIVANT
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and RANDY MOORE, United States Forest Service Chief
Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-3460
Plaintiff: IVAN RENE MOORE
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, ASSET RELIANCE, INC. and others
Williams v. Luna, et al.
as 24-3187
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant: SHERIFF LUNA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and others
Johnson v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2779
Plaintiff: CHARLEY JOHNSON, Trustee of the Charley E. Johnson Revocable Living Trust
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Moore v. Stolsig, et al.
as 24-2704
Plaintiff: KEVIN MOE MOORE
Defendant: MELISSA STOLSIG, JONNA DONLAP, ALICIA NIX and others
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff: D. DIAZ
Defendant: MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Zaslavsky v. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2367
Plaintiff: NEAL S. ZASLAVSKY, ATTORNEY, an individual
Defendant: CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES, a California non-profit corporation, MINH TRI NGUYEN, an individual, IBIERE SECK, an individual and others
Cervantes v. Moore
as 24-2391
Petitioner: GINO CERVANTES
Respondent: SHAWN MOORE
LaRocca v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2323
Plaintiff: JOSEPH LAROCCA
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHEL MOORE, Chief and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?