Cases 1 - 10 of 579
Weems v. Burton, et al.
as 24-3179
Petitioner:
ZIR ION WEEMS
Respondent:
ROBERT BURTON and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Sanchez v. St. Andre, et al.
as 24-2914
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ROB ST. ANDRE and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cormier v. People of the State of California, et al.
as 24-2599
Plaintiff:
IAN LAMONTE CORMIER
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GREG HORTA, Deputy Sheriff, LEON, Detective and others
Gonshorowski v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1985
Petitioner:
ANALEAH MORIAH GONSHOROWSKI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
People of the State of California v. Express Scripts, Inc., et al.
as 24-1972
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through Los Angeles County Counsel Dawyn R. Harrison
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., EXPRESS SCRIPTS ADMINISTRATORS, LLC, ESI MAIL PHARMACY SERVICE, INC. and others
Chukwu v. People of the State of California
as 24-1751
Petitioner:
CHUKWU OBINNA
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
State of California, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
as 24-1087
Petitioner:
People of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Yu v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-958
Petitioner:
DANIEL YU
Respondent:
ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden, MARTIN GAMBOA, Avenal State Prison and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest
Huff v. People of the State of California
as 24-641
Petitioner:
ROD ANTHONY HUFF
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Calderon v. People of the State of California
as 24-495
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS CALDERON
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
