Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Quintanilla Velasquez v. Garland
as 24-2804
Petitioner:
LILIANA LOURDES QUINTANILLA VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Quintanilla-Rivas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2293
Petitioner:
ROBERTO ANTONIO QUINTANILLA-RIVAS, HILDA LISSETH CANJURA-MANCIA, JORDAN MATTEO QUINTANILLA-CANJURA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina De Acevedo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1848
Petitioner:
KARLA MELISSA MOLINA DE ACEVEDO, MAILYN ALONDRA ACEVEDO-MOLINA and ADONYS GILBERTO ACEVED-QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-973
Petitioner:
DEMAR MARTINEZ, ANA QUINTANILLA MARTINEZ and EDGAR QUINTANILLA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Orellana Duran, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4319
Petitioner:
ERICK ADALBERTO ORELLANA DURAN, JENNIFER QUINTANILLA LADAVERDE and JONATHAN ORELLANA QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Miranda Quintanilla, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3516
Petitioner:
MERLIN SAID MIRANDA QUINTANILLA, GABRIELA SARAHI GAMEZ MATEO and JONATHAN ISAI MIRANDA GAMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Quintanilla-Cortez v. Garland
as 23-1057
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO QUINTANILLA-CORTEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Juan Quintanilla Vasquez, et al v. Libre by Nexus, Inc.
as 23-15278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, GABRIELA JAMILETH PERDOMO ORTIZ, VICTOR HUGO CATALAN MOLINA and others
Appellant:
MICHAEL DONOVAN, RICHARD MOORE and EVAN AJIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC.
Flores Quintanilla v. Garland
as 23-74
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR FLORES QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez-Quintanilla, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1998
Petitioner:
RHINA ZULEIMA VASQUEZ-QUINTANILLA and DAVID ANTONIO PORTILLO-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
