Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,270
Williams v. Luna, et al.
as 24-3187
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant: SHERIFF LUNA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and others
Rodriguez Rafael v. Garland
as 24-3206
Petitioner: JOSE OSWVALDO RODRIGUEZ RAFAEL
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Marin v. Lee, et al.
as 24-3186
Plaintiff: MEL M. MARIN, AKA: Mel Marinkovic
Defendant: ADRIENNE LEE, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities, KENDYL MAGNUSON, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities, STAR RIVERA-LACEY, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities and others
Rodriguez-Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3159
Petitioner: EVELYN YANIRA RODRIGUEZ-CRUZ and JEROBOAM OSEAS NATANAHEL NAJAERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez Benitez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3160
Petitioner: CARMEN YESSENIA HERNANDEZ BENITEZ and DILAN JAFET RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3113
Petitioner: MARICELA ELIZABETH RODRIGUEZ DOMINGUEZ, KIMBERLY MICHELLE MORAN RODRIGUEZ and CHRISS ENRIQUE MORAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Aparicio, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3085
Petitioner: SILVIA JULIANA RODRIGUEZ-APARICIO and JULIAN ESTEBAN RODRIGUEZ-APARICIO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vaquiz-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2999
Petitioner: KAREN VAQUIZ-RODRIGUEZ and BRIHANA LOBO-VAQUIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hall v. Rodriguez
as 24-2972
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: ROSUETA RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez v. URS Midwest, Inc., et al.
as 24-2969
Plaintiff: ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: URS MIDWEST, INC. and UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?