Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,750
Walker v. People of the State of California
as 24-3435
Petitioner: ROY LEE WALKER
Respondent: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Hazari v. Santa Clara County Superior Court, et al.
as 24-3353
Plaintiff: CYRUS HAZARI
Defendant: SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, APPEAL COURT OF THE SIXTH DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT and others
Rodriguez v. Martinez, et al.
as 24-3284
Petitioner: PEDRO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: KELLY MARTINEZ, San Diego Sheriff and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TruConnect Communication, Inc. v. Peterson
as 24-3297
Plaintiff: TRUCONNECT COMMUNICATION, INC., a California corporation
Defendant: RACHEL PETERSON, n her official capacity as Executive Director of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and in her individual capacity
Weems v. Burton, et al.
as 24-3179
Petitioner: ZIR ION WEEMS
Respondent: ROBERT BURTON and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Vitale v. State of California Franchise Tax Board, et al.
as 24-2906
Plaintiff: FRANCESCO VITALE
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD and DAVID A. HUBBERT, Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Sanchez v. St. Andre, et al.
as 24-2914
Petitioner: FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent: ROB ST. ANDRE and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Thomas v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 24-2810
Plaintiff: CRAIG A. THOMAS
Defendant: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Smith v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-2790
Petitioner: RONALD J. SMITH
Respondent: MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2751
Plaintiff: UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor, ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?