Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Apache Stronghold v. USA, et al
as 21-15295
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL BOSWORTH, Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, TOM TORRES, Acting Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APACHE STRONGHOLD, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization
Amicus Curiae:
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY LAW SCHOLARS, NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS, A TRIBAL ELDER, AND OTHER FEDERAL INDIAN LAW SCHOLARS AND ORGANIZATIONS, JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, THE SIKH COALITION, AND PROTECT THE 1st and others
Frank Wall v. USDA Forest Service, et al
as 16-36009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK REGINALD WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
USDA FOREST SERVICE, DAVID E. SCHMID, Deputy Regional Forester, CHRISTOPHER S. SAVAGE, Supervisor and others
City of Tombstone v. USA, et al
as 12-16172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF TOMBSTONE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TOM VILSAK, Secretary of Agriculture and others
Organized Village of Kake, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 11-35517
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE, THE BOAT COMPANY, ALASKA WILDERNESS RECREATION AND TOURISM ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, INC.
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA
Public Lands For The People, I, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 11-15007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PUBLIC LANDS FOR THE PEOPLE, INC., a California 501 C-3, non-profit corporation, GERALD E. HOBBS, BRYAN BUNTING and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
