Fair Labor Standards Act Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Jane Roes, et al v. SFBSC Management, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17079
Plaintiff - Appellee: JANE ROES, 1-2, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant: SARAH MURPHY, POOHRAWN MEHRABAN and DEVON LOCKE
Defendant - Appellee: SFBSC MANAGEMENT, LLC
Christerphor Ziglar, et al v. Express Messenger Systems, Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-16920
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHRISTERPHOR ZIGLAR, LEAH CANDELARIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MAURICE MEINTZER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant: EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA Ontrac
Marcos Rivera v. Saul Chevrolet, Inc., et al
as 17-16028
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARCOS RIVERA, individually, on behalf of the general public, and all other similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: SAUL CHEVROLET, INC., a California corporation, CARDINALE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP OF TAHOE, INC., a California corporation, CARDINALE AG NEVADA, INC., a Nevada corporation and others
Defendant: CARDINALE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, a California business entity, CARDINALEWAY ACURA, a Nevada business entity, VOLKSWAGEN HYUNDAI, a California business entity and others
Terri Hayford v. NationStar Mortgage, LLC, et al
as 17-15614
Plaintiff - Appellee: TERRI HAYFORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Defendant: AEROTEK, INC.
Virginia Van Dusen, et al v. Swift Transportation Company I, et al
as 17-15102
Plaintiff - Appellee: VIRGINIA VAN DUSEN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons and JOHN DOE, 1
Defendant - Appellant: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY INCORPORATED, INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT LEASING INCORPORATED, CHAD KILLIBREW and others
Arsenio Pelayo, et al v. Platinum Limousine Services, I, et al
as 16-16991
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARSENIO PELAYO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, FRANCIS MANANKIL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and BRANDON BORELIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: PLATINUM LIMOUSINE SERVICES, INC. and KURT TSUNEYOSHI
Arsenio Pelayo, et al v. Platinum Limousine Services, I, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16989
Plaintiff - Appellee: ARSENIO PELAYO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, FRANCIS MANANKIL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and BRANDON BORELIZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: PLATINUM LIMOUSINE SERVICES, INC. and KURT TSUNEYOSHI
Claire Gerard, et al v. John Paul Mitchell Systems, et al
as 16-56281
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLAIRE GERARD, individual, and all others similarly situated, MELODY NORTHROP, individual, and all others similarly situated, BERENISA CORTES PALOMINOS and others
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS, a California Corporation, PAUL MITCHELL THE SCHOOL, a business entity of unknown form, DOES, 1 through 100 inclusive and others
Kristy Douglas, et al v. Xerox Business Services, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-35425
Plaintiff - Appellant: KRISTY DOUGLAS and TYSHEKA RICHARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: XEROX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, LIVEBRIDGE, INC, an Oregon corporation, AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Karen Taylor, et al v. West Marine Products, Inc.
as 14-16933
Plaintiff - Appellee: KAREN TAYLOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and PAULISA FIELDS
Defendant - Appellant: WEST MARINE PRODUCTS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?