Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Allen Munro, et al v. USC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55550
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALLEN L. MUNRO, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the University of Southern California Defined Contribution Retirement Plan and the University of Southern California Tax Deferred Annuity Plan, DANIEL C. WHEELER, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the University of Southern California Defined Contribution Retirement Plan and the University of Southern California Tax Deferred Annuity Plan, EDWARD E. VAYNMAN, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the University of Southern California Defined Contribution Retirement Plan and the University of Southern California Tax Deferred Annuity Plan and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, USC RETIREMENT PLAN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE and LISA MAZZOCCO
K. M., et al v. Regence Blueshield, et al
as 14-35108
Plaintiff - Appellee: K. M., by and through his parents and guardians, L.M. and E.M., individually on behalf of Garrigan Lyman Group Health Benefit Plan, B. S., by and through his parents and guardians, E.S. and R.S., individually on behalf of Garrigan Lyman Group Health Benefit Plan, GARRIGAN LYMAN GROUP HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN and others
Defendant - Appellant: REGENCE BLUESHIELD and CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., FKA The Regence Group
Trustees of the Alaska Laborer v. Raindance Healthcare Group, In, et al
as 10-35985
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRUSTEES OF THE ALASKA LABORERS HEALTH AND SECURITY, RETIREMENT, TRAINING AND LEGAL SERVICES TRUST FUNDS
Defendant: RAINDANCE HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: ANDREW L. TURNER, individually and WILLIAM LASKY, individually

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?