Cases 91 - 100 of 309
Keon Park v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 21-15793
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEON KYUN PARK
Trent Henrickson v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 21-15713
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, GARY PICCININI, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRENT HENRICKSON
Darrell Conners v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 21-15693
Respondent / Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRELL CONNERS
Elizabeth Carley v. Nevens, et al
as 21-15637
Respondent / Appellee:
NEVENS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Harold Edwards v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-15573
Petitioner / Appellant:
HAROLD EDWARDS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and STATE OF NEVADA
John Farnum v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 21-15529
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL FARNUM
Scott Casteel v. William Gittere, et al
as 21-15509
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Substituted for Brian E. Williams, Sr., and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT CASTEEL
Ramiro Rodriguez-Carillo v. Garrett, et al
as 21-15510
Respondent / Appellee:
GARRETT, Attorney and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-CARILLO
Troy Emanuel, Jr. v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 21-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY RAY EMANUEL, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
James Moore v. Jerry Howell, et al
as 21-15394
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JERRY HOWELL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
