Cases 11 - 20 of 807
Ramos Cuenca v. Garland
as 24-2483
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS RAMOS CUENCA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos-Funes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2205
Petitioner:
DOMINGO RAMOS-FUNES and OSIAS MOISES RAMOS-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Melara-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2187
Petitioner:
ERIC DANIEL MELARA-MARTINEZ, EVELYN CAROLINA RAMOS RUIZ, STEVEN MISAEL MARTINEZ RAMOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1805
Petitioner:
JULIA MARINA RUIZ RAMOS and CHELSEY YAHAIRA FELIPE RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-1856
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, Judge, Martinez Court - Contra Costa County, C. BIRCH and others
Castro Ramos v. Garland
as 24-1706
Petitioner:
LUIS ERASMO CASTRO RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Mariscal v. Garland
as 24-1710
Petitioner:
LUIS RODOLFO RAMOS MARISCAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Zea-Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1408
Petitioner:
KAROL JENNIFER ZEA-RAMOS, JUAN MANUEL AMAYA-AGUIRRE and JOSBA MICHAEL AMAYA-ZEA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Richardson v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH BICK, Director of Correctional Health Care Services, individual and official capacity, JENNIFER BARRETTO, Director of Correctional Health Care Policy and Administration, individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
