Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,303
Richmond v. Reese, et al.
as 24-1811
Plaintiff: MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant: MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff, STEVEN ALEXANDER and KURTISS MORRISON
Rivera Orellana, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1747
Petitioner: ANGEL MAURICIO RIVERA ORELLANA, HELEN YAMILETH CEBILLA DIAZ and MAURICIO ALEXANDER RIVERA CEBILLA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Favor v. Harper
as 24-1694
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: ANTHONY HARPER
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff: SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Madrid Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1548
Petitioner: GIGSI PAOLA MADRID HERNANDEZ, ARJEN ALEXANDER MEJIA MADRID, SOFIA MONSERRAT AVELAR MADRID and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Motivar Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1464
Petitioner: STEFANY MOTIVAR GONZALEZ, YIMMI ALEXANDER ROBALLO PAYARES, EDDIE SANTIAGO ARANGO MOTIVAR and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Prado-Majano v. Garland
as 24-1459
Petitioner: MOISES ALEXANDER PRADO-MAJANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cano Velandia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1409
Petitioner: DEISY ANDRE CANO VELANDIA, JHOSETH SNAYDER VARGAS-CANO, KENNETH M VARGAS-CANO and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pineda Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1396
Petitioner: ALEXANDER PINEDA LOPEZ, BLANCA FLORES DE PINEDA, FREDY PINEDA FLORES and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reina de Diaz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1398
Petitioner: ROXANA GUADALUPE REINA DE DIAZ, DIEGO ENRIQUE DIAZ REYNA and MATEO ALEXANDER DIAZ REINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?